For the first several years of our marriage and ministry I had the pleasure of using a roll top desk. There can never be too many pockets, slots, or drawers in a desk, and the wonderful part of it is that you often make new friends with things you’ve stashed months earlier. That’s okay, unless what you stashed are bills. Bills happily find their way to the very bottom of desk drawers and can run from the light faster than a speeding cockroach. After more than one overdue bill debacle (and a little encouragement from my wife), I finally learned never to put a bill in a drawer until I had paid it. In this respect, both religion and science are commonly guilty of putting their bills out of sight – and they are long since past due.
Consider our sincere and venerable Mormon friends – and I mean no disrespect. They worship a god named Elohim, whom they identify as the Biblical God with the same name. However, they are not the same by any means. The problem begins with beginnings. According to accepted LDS doctrine, Elohim was once a man who ultimately elevated himself to godhood and creator status, just as all aspiring Mormons may do. This then begs the question – why worship this LDS Elohim? He is not the first and therefore, should not be the one we ultimately worship. Brigham Young would later teach that matter is eternal. In so doing, he pushed the “origins” bill back to matter itself. You may accuse Young of many things, but stupidity should never be on the list. While most Mormons I know refuse to broach this discussion, the fact remains, the LDS have stuffed this “origins” bill in the desk drawer and failed to come up with a lucid response.
Nor do we disrespect or fault the character of physicists who embrace the big bang theory. But notice, they too have stuffed their unpaid bills in a desk drawer. Physicists, like Mormons, actually have two unpaid bills. The first relates to the questions surrounding origins and the second around the forces that move the creation forward – a force they commonly label evolution (be it organic or inorganic.) Physicists conveniently use the back of the bottom drawer by insisting that time answers all evolutionary questions and the big bang answers the issues of origin. When asked about time, space, motion, the laws of physics so called, they insist that it all inherent in the bang. If that isn’t a leap of faith, nothing is. As to the bang itself, who knows? That bill is to embarrassing to even review. To satisfy us all they revert to their perennial penchant for creating temporary “placeholder theories” which are conveniently replaced in the name of progress with yet newer ones. The recent assertion that the “microwave grid” supports big bang, as well as the misbehaving dust cloud G2 in Sagitarrius A – are two examples which have necessitated some very quick revisionism!
We have every right to accuse both physicists and religionists in general of, at the least, “burying their bills.”
The Bible believer, on the other hand simply begins at the beginning, “In the beginning, God.” He assumes the existence of a creator God and builds his whole cosmology on what that God has revealed about Himself. Of course, God did not have an origin because He was not created. He exists outside of the creation and is sovereignly independent from it, though He adamantly insists that He carries it forward.
Those who embrace this truth have endured millennia of placeholder cosmological theories – each loudly trumped as a more intelligent answer than believing in a personal God who created the universe. And, each, in turn, is replaced by another when it is shown to be facetious.
While men can certainly ferrite out truths from the natural creation, their various mechanical theories will never stand until they find the unifying Principle that makes it all work. Nor has Elohim settled for revealing Himself in the creation alone. He chose to reveal Himself personally through His Son, the one through whom He created heaven and earth, who carries it forward, and the one with whom we have to do business! (Colossians 2:1-4)
And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent: Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead. Acts 17:30-31
A Look Back at the Royal Wedding
We recently witnessed a royal wedding which topped the scales then it came to showcasing the beauty of the bride, the sensitivity of the groom and the deep and joyous affection each reflected on the other. It was heartwarming. We wish God’s very best for them.
Further, love was certainly the theme of the wedding, and certainly, the wedding sermon in particular - and we rejoice in all of this. The message, itself, however, should not go without warning. Love, not Jesus Christ, was offered as the solution to the world’s woes. Make no mistake, our Lord was quoted and was even cited as the ultimate example of sacrificial love, and for this we commend the speaker. Therein also lies the error. Christ was far more than an example. He was the sacrifice for our sins, He was the substitute who died in our place. He addressed the one issue the wedding speaker never addressed. Until the sin issue is resolved, men cannot love fully and completely, and sadly, love will never triumph. Liberation theology can never liberate until men are freed from their sins at the cross.
Those who watched the responses of the listeners (who represented an essentially post Christian culture), were likely impressed with the subtle cynicism which seemed to be reflected from face to face. And why shouldn’t they be cynical. Love, stripped of true redemption, may serve well as a bandaid for men, but it can never be a solution. This theology has failed a generation who embraced it and deserves a cynical response. Sadly, these dear listeners have been deprived of the One solution which has always worked when embraced.
“Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.” 1 John4:10.
Simplifying the Rapture Discussion in Five Steps
The Pretribulation Rapture is being uniformly scuttled in church doctrinal statements everywhere. One’s position on the rapture is now considered “optional” and is certainly not a thing to be debated, or required in church doctrinal statements. These folks are throwing out more than one baby with the bathwater!
Don’t be overwhelmed by the rhetoric! Once we grasp the major issues surrounding the rapture, it’s easy to locate the scriptures which reveal this precious truth!
Ignore the nonsense!
If one simply “Googles in” the rapture discussion he risks becoming overwhelmed by the volume of material on the subject. One daunting article, for example, lists 250 reasons for the rapture (the majority of which are good)! Most articles, however, are highly charged, emotional arguments against this precious truth. Don’t be intimidated when you encounter these kinds of approaches:
1. The word rapture does not even occur in the Bible. To be raptured simply means to be “caught up.” While the English word does not appear in the Bible, the Greek word and idea certainly does and we get the doctrine from that very word “harpazo,” exactly as it is found in 1 Thessalonians 4:17. Many wonderful doctrines don’t have English representations in our Bible. For example, the words trinity and millennium are not there. This argument is a ploy to distract folks from the biblical truth.
2. Historical arguments don’t work either. Supposedly, Darby (a founding father of Dispensationalism) listened to the fanciful vision of an 18 year old girl, and thus invented this doctrine. This attack is favored by the Church of Christ folks who never tire of repeating it. In reality, we don’t really care who did or did not have a vision. We do not care whether Darby did nor did not give an audience to this girl. One fact, remains, the rapture is clearly taught and easily recognized in the Bible and no one assumes it is true based on someone’s vision. If there is anything which would scare a true Dispensationalist off, it is the idea that his doctrine is based on anything other than the literal interpretation of God’s Word!
3. There are also fabricated arguments. Adventists favor this “straw man” tack. They consistently misrepresent what we mean and teach by the rapture. They insist that we teach a “secret rapture,” and then list a bunch of verses declaring that the Lord’s appearance will be visible by all. There is nothing secret about the rapture and Adventists know that rapture teachers do not embrace this silliness. Yet they persist. This is an openly deceitful ploy, and it rightfully challenges the
integrity of Adventism in other areas as well.
4. Then there are emotional arguments. The most significant is that folks cannot imagine Christ receiving an impure church unto Himself. She must go through the fires of the tribulation in order to purify her metaphorical robes, as it were. Such folks might as well teach purgatory. What about all the impure Christians who are already dead? And since when is the blood of Christ not sufficient to purify us? (Ephesians 5:25-27) Will the tribulation accomplish what the blood of Christ cannot? The raptured believer will face the Bema seat, but he will do so in a spotless robe! More to the point, the issue is not whether an argument satisfies us emotionally. If it is Bible truth it is Bible truth whether we like it or not. The Bible does not teach such purgative nonsense no matter how reasonable it seems to some.
Focus on the KEY passages.
Before we too become overwhelmed by all the nonsense, consider taking the time to read a few simple passages from the Word of God. Read them in their entirety. Read them in their simplicity. They are easily understood. John 14:1-3; 1 Cor. 15:51-52; 1 Thess. 4:13-18; Philippians 3:20-21.
1. John 14 explains the purpose of the rapture. Christ will personally return and bring us unto Himself and to His Father’s house. The whole purpose is so He can take us unto Himself. This is what makes the rapture so sweet!
2. 1 Corinthians 15:51-52 explains the physical necessity for the rapture. This event was a
mystery. The resurrection was not a mystery (Job 19:26).The mystery was that Christians would be changed. Both dead and living believers will exchange their mortal remains and bodies for their resurrection bodies.
3. 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 explains the mechanics of the rapture. We are not to be ignorant of these details. Those who are now with Christ will be brought with Him. We who are alive at the time will not precede them in this event. Their bodies will rise first, and we will join them as we are caught up (raptured) together in the clouds. Again, notice the purpose, so that we may “ever be with the Lord!” The Bible’s word for the coming of the Lord is the Greek word parousia which stresses His presence (the fact that He is coming physically) and we will enjoy that presence forever! Chapter 5 then continues on with the Day of the Lord which will follow.
4. Philippians 3:20 and 21 explains the timing of the rapture. We are to be looking (waiting with
full expectation) for this grand event during which our vile bodies will be transfigured and we
will go to the land of our citizenship! We will expand on this in the next step.
Put imminence in your arsenal!
The rapture is imminent and can happen at any time. The second coming of Christ cannot happen until specific prophetic events (Daniel’s seventieth week, for example) have occurred. Many view the rapture verses we have cited as relating to the second coming of Christ. They miss the simple doctrine of imminence.
1. We are waiting for the coming of Christ (1 Cor. 1:7, 8).
2. In 1 Thessalonians 1:9, 10 the Thessalonians were saved in order to wait for the return of Christ from heaven in order to be delivered from the “wrath to come.” This appearance out of heaven is clearly the rapture mentioned in 4:13-18 and it precedes the wrath to come mentioned in 5:3-9. For a very thorough treatment of these verses, see http://www.pre-trib org/data/pdf/Brindle-BiblicalEvidenceforth.pdf.
3. Notice 1 Corinthians 1:7 where even the Corinthian believers were eagerly “awaiting” the coming of Christ. Yet the same Paul, who commended the Corinthians for this, would never have done so if he knew all of Daniel’s 70th week had to occur first.
4. In Titus 2:11-13, it is grace which teaches us to be looking for the blessed hope and glorious
appearing of Christ.
5. 1 John 3:2,3 tells us that this hope for the return of Christ promotes self-purification.
Obviously, Bible teachers have delved far more deeply into these verses than space allows here, but
they remain good starting points for teaching the fact that our Lord could return at any moment!
This precludes the idea that Christ could return in the middle of the Day of the Lord or at the
end. In those cases, we would be watching for the Day of the Lord.
6. Paul does explain the conditions which will usher in the antichrist (2 Thessalonians 2:1-12). Because he did this some say he assumed the Thessalonian believers were expected to watch for those conditions. On the contrary, Paul was simply explaining that the Day of the Lord had not yet come because those conditions had, obviously, not been met. Paul was protecting the Thessalonians from the idea that the rapture had come, he was assuring them that they would not be overtaken by this future day which will come as a thief in the night. You and I who see these conditions on the horizon are wise to have our spiritual houses in order. We are not foolish enough to predict when the rapture will occur, but neither are we ignorant how world events are rushing toward the end times.
Separate the two comings of Christ.
Christ does not come for His saints and return with His saints at the same time. These are separate events.
1. The fact that Christ would come with His saints is seen throughout both the Old and New Testaments (Dan. 7:13-14; Mat. 24:27-30; 1 Cor. 15:51-52).
2. The fact that Christ would first come for His saints was a mystery (1 Cor. 15:51). When Christ returns the second time, the signs preceding the event will be clearly seen, He will personally and physically return in great power and judgment, and all the earth will tremble at His coming. (Mat. 25:31, Rev. 19:11-16 and 15-21, Mat. 24:30, Acts 1:11, Rev. 1:7)
Separate God’s plan for the church from Israel.
1. The Lord Jesus Christ has an intricate plan for the world which He will ultimately complete in and through Israel. Scores of scripture passages in both the Old and New Testaments argue this point, and Romans 9, 10, and 11 give us a brief overview of this plan, past, present, and future.
2. The church age which occurs between Daniel’s 69th and 70th week (See Daniel 9:24-27) was not
prophesied. Not only does the Bible clearly state that this age was a mystery, but it also states that Christ will work out His mission to reach the Gentile nations through His body, the church. That is, unlike ages past and future, the church in this age fulfills the unique role of being the body through which He carries out His work (Colossians 1:24-28). When Jesus Christ personally executes the events of the Day of the Lord as outlined in Revelation 4 and 5, the work of the church will have consummated. In fact, the four and twenty elders will have already been judged (as evidenced by their victors’ crowns in Revelation 4:4). They will personally witness the work of Christ in the judgment of the entire world, the protection and salvation of a remnant of Jews throughout that tribulation period, and the ultimate salvation of all Israel. Israel, not the church is once again in focus. There is not as much as a hint that the church, the body of Christ through whom He ministered in His physical absence, will have any part in these events. This article includes a brief summary of the discussion, designed especially to assure new believers who are being “tossed about with every wind of doctrine.” Students who are struggling with particular aspects of this discussion are invited to send us a note. We will happily connect them with the best resources we know of to help them along in their study of God’s Word. Are you ready for the rapture?
Don’t waste a minute!
Just so you know....In an age when folks work hard to obscure their true beliefs, we want you to know we love all of our brethren in Christ everywhere, but we stand squarely on the Bible alone and we interpret it in its normal literal sense. For a detailed explanation visit our What We Believe page at Breadcrumbs.org.